IT outsourcing
Outsourced software development
Teams that integrate into how you work, not a supplier that delivers a binary and disappears.
In summary: full stack, mobile and product development teams, integrated into your roadmap and processes. Code, documentation and intellectual property are yours from day one, and that is worth setting down in the contract.
Outsourced development almost always fails for the same reason, and it is not technical: the external team lacks enough business context to make the small decisions taken daily without asking.
So the model that works is not fixed-scope commissioning but an integrated team, with access to the same repository, the same board and the same conversations as your internal team.
What is included
Configured to the project in the proposal.
- Full stack, mobile and product development
- Integration into your repository, board and review process
- Code review and automated testing as part of the flow
- Technical documentation maintained during the project
- Participation in whatever agile ceremonies you already run
- Orderly handover at the end, with documentation current
What is not included
The limits that prevent a wrong expectation.
- Product decisions and roadmap prioritisation, which are yours
- Deadline commitments on undefined scope
- Administration of your production infrastructure, which belongs to managed services
- Guarantees of business outcomes from the software delivered
Where it is delivered from
From Poland where the project requires EU data residency or full synchronous coordination, since it shares a time zone with mainland Spain.
From Uzbekistan where work is measured by delivery and a daily coordination window is sufficient. In that model we always recommend a technical lead acting as a bridge, because design and scope conversations happen in technical English.
Intellectual property and data access
Code, documentation and intellectual property rights created in the project are yours. It is worth stating that expressly in the contract rather than assuming it, along with the treatment of third-party dependencies and open source licences used.
On data: the most effective measure in a development project is usually structural, working on development environments and test data, and restricting access to environments holding real data to what is strictly necessary, with role-based control and access logging.
If the project requires continuous access to real personal data of European customers from outside the European Economic Area, it is worth reviewing the delivery model before the contract.
Frequently asked questions
Who owns the code?
You do. It is stated expressly in the contract, along with documentation and the licence position of the dependencies used.
Do you work in our repository?
Yes, that is the model we recommend. A team working in a parallel repository accumulates divergence and turns every integration into a project.
What if the project ends earlier than planned?
Handover is planned from the start: documentation kept current during the project rather than written at the end, when nobody remembers why a decision was made.
Can you work with our internal team?
That is usual and works best. The integrated team model means sharing board, code review and context, not working in parallel.
Need to add development capacity?
Tell us the roadmap, the stack and the coordination model you expect.